[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Reliability of data (Was: Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).)



On 6/28/07, Daniel Ruoso <daniel@ruoso.com> wrote:
Ter, 2007-06-12 às 10:26 -0300, Gustavo Franco escreveu:
> Any idea on how to collect more reliable data in a opt-in base? Does a
> survey on pentabarf (or public acessible) during debconf makes sense?

Huh.... How can "opt-in" data be more reliable then disperse collection?

When the disperse collection doesn't point exact to the data (yes, the
data not the result) you want to analyze. In other words, that's why
some people are asked for who they're going to vote in a election
(opt-in base but also a disperse collection) and the statistics aren't
based on how much people are reporting bugs against Debian suite X, Y
or Z. :-)

regards,
-- stratus
http://stratusandtheswirl.blogspot.com
get debian @ http://get.debian.net/



Reply to: