[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).

On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 06:20:17PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> I would like to ask you interested in our next release to stop and
> look at 'testing' for a while. I believe that now, during the start of
> a development cycle and during debcamp/debconf we've a interesting
> opportunity to review pros and cons of our current approach.
> We believe that 'testing' means that things shouldn't break as badly
> as in unstable or experimental. That's important understand the
> automatic update concept of unstable and the experimental
> non-automatic nature. In other words use unstable means that upgrade
> is dangerous, use unstable and experimental means that you pick how
> much more of the danger you want from there (experimental).
> Let me outline the 'testing' pros and cons from my point of view:
> pros
> -----
> * testing is under control of release team, it's supposed to be harder
> to a random developer break our next release
> * testing is our 'daily updated' release snapshot
> cons
> -----
> * testing metric is too simple, packages are allowed to enter testing
> only after a certain period of time has passed no matter if much
> people tested it before that and just when they don't have
> release-critical bugs filed  against them.
> * developers and most active contributors are pretty much using only
> stable or unstable and not testing.
> I've two different proposals to address the cons trying to avoid as
> much as possible create new cons, they are:
> 1) The 'remove experimental' proposal
experimental is not a 'full' branch like stable, testing or unstable. It
only has a handfull of package built for it (at least that is what I
have seen from reading debian-devel-changes)
Also, there is no transition from experimental to unstable.
checkout my diagram at http://mysite.verizon.net/kevin.mark/
(there is an older,not updated dia source in spanish if that is
|  .''`.  == Debian GNU/Linux == |       my web site:           |
| : :' :      The  Universal     |mysite.verizon.net/kevin.mark/|
| `. `'      Operating System    | go to counter.li.org and     |
|   `-    http://www.debian.org/ |    be counted! #238656       |
|  my keyserver: subkeys.pgp.net |     my NPO: cfsg.org         |
|join the new debian-community.org to help Debian!              |
|_______  Unless I ask to be CCd, assume I am subscribed _______|

Attachment: pgpKtntnxDa7J.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: