Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> While I agree on the burden, I don't think it's wise to rely on other
> tools to merge multiple informations in a single file which would then be
> given to dpkg-gensymbols.
Hmm, how is this different from the way *.shlibs files are handled
> I want to first do archive-wide rebuilds and see how many packages have
> differences between arches and what's best to handle them.
Good idea; gathering some data should help.