[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?

also sprach Robert Collins <robertc@robertcollins.net> [2007.05.31.0021 +0200]:
> I think its entirely viable. boost::python is rather nice and should
> allow incremental migration. You could if you care start with a C++
> wrapper using boost:python where all the guts are in python, and then
> its just a question of how much is pure c++ :).

I know of at least one person who'd kill me if I used boost for
netconf. But as a migrational strategy, this isn't bad, although my
experience has been that you don't use boost, it uses you. Or
rather, you need to cater your application for boost, despite all
the generic programming it does.

Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
Most Intelligent Customers Realise Our Software Only Fools Them.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)

Reply to: