[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Mandatory -dbg packages for libraries?



On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 04:40:45PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:

> That's an argument in favor of making the base library package built
> with debug symbols and then stripped[1], not of requiring -dbg packages.

Depends what you put in the -dbg package; it could be the symbols
stripped out of the main binary.

-- 
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: