On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 10:13:47AM +0000, paddy@panici.net wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 05:09:12AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > >Russ Allbery wrote: > > >So, here's a possibly weird proposal. > > > > > >What if we had some mechanism whereby people could indicate interest in > > >maintaining a package should anything happen to the current maintainer? > > >Have it be as non-confrontational as possible by having it not indicate > > >any feeling about whether the package is currently maintained well, > > >just a willingness to help should the current maintainer be unable to > > >continue for some reason. > > an "understudy" or "standby" ? > Could we call it "co-maintainer" or something like that? Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature