[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Attempted summary and thoughts

"cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)" <cobaco@skolelinux.no> writes:

>    Automatically orphaning such packages has problems as Russel pointed out,
>    but a "needs co-maintainers"/"needs hijacking" list of packages where
>    DD's can be more aggressive in jumping/taking over in seems a good idea
>    IMO.

You could allow and encourage NMUs for bugs of priority less than
important that are more than 6 months old.


Reply to: