Re: Where did Bacula 1.38.11-7+b1 come from?
John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 12:13:07AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> > binNMUs though. Aren't buildds simply there to build the existing
>> > sources on other platforms? Surely some human was involved here?
>>
>> wanna-build and buildd have been modified a while back to be able to do
>> binNMU's. The only human involvement is when a given package is marked
>> in the database as 'requires a binNMU', and when the buildd admin later
>> signs the package, as usual.
>
> Would it be possible to record the name of the human that marked the
> package in debian/changelog? That would be a big help, I think (and
> hopefully avoid a discussion on debian-devel next time it happens)
Since this is about a binNMU where the source package is not touched
and the changelog lives inside the source package how is that supposed
to be possible?
Adding to the changelog requires a new upload.
Matthias
Reply to: