Re: Bug#410502: ITP: libcm -- Support code for compositing managers
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:50:39PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/11/07 12:58, =?//TRANSLIT?Q?Lo=EFc?= Minier wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 11, 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >>>> * URL : http://www.example.org/
> >>> No upstream website I know of.
> >> FTP site?
> >> Where do you get the source from?
> >
> > ftp.gnome.org, but not worth mentionning in the package description;
> > it's mentionned in the copyright of course. I imagine people reading
> > ITPs are curious of homepages, not of where to get the tarball from.
> >
> >>>> * License : LGPL, GPL, BSD
> >>> (This is correct.)
> >> It's tri-licensed?
> >
> > No, it's a mixture.
>
> I smell a long thread on -legal.
Why? All these licenses are compatible. Depending on what the GPL-only
code is used for, the resulting library will either be GPL or LGPL.
Finding out which should be quite simple.
Regards: David
--
/) David Weinehall <tao@debian.org> /) Rime on my window (\
// ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ // Diamond-white roses of fire //
\) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Beautiful hoar-frost (/
Reply to: