Re: Attempts at security (was Re: Draft spec for new dpkg "triggers" feature)
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 12:27:41PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Saturday 03 February 2007 23:47, Hendrik Sattler
> <debian@hendrik-sattler.de> wrote:
> > > It's disabled by default, unlike in Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux
> > > where it's on by default. I believe that the latest release of SUSE has
> > > AppArmor on by default.
> > RedHat has a long history of strange decisions.
> Red Hat has a long history of making Linux easy to use. Try using Fedora and
> Debian for the same sys-admin tasks and compare. You will discover that
> right from the install Fedora is a lot easier. Of course the Debian
> installer gives many options that the Fedora installer doesn't (degraded RAID
> arrays and encrypted block devices as two examples), but it's a lot harder to
> use.
Any chance we could stick to arguing the technical case for SELinux, instead
of inviting the thread to be further derailed in response to FUD about the
usability of the Debian installer?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: