Re: Attempts at security
Am Samstag 03 Februar 2007 13:17 schrieb Russell Coker:
> Anyway, if the overhead of SE Linux in the kernel is something you consider
> to be a problem then there are many bigger problems that you will have with
> the Debian kernel packages (or probably any kernel image from a binary
> distribution). Best to just compile your own kernel.
At some point they just add. I don't have a problem compiling my own kernels
but is there any site describing use case scenarios for selinux and also
consider to not use it for some scenarios?
It's just that I am pretty sure that I do not need it. However, using the
term "security" seems to set a flag in some minds that somehow implies the
idea of getting it to everyone, needed or not.
Is it that strange to raise a flag and keep saying that there are some that
don't need it and don't want it?
Typical example in _my_ case are selinux and fine grained file system extended
ACLs.
HS
Reply to: