Re: Bugs in default GNOME etch?
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:28:06 +0100
Josselin Mouette <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Having eog and evince in the menu serves the "I want to look at a file I
> know I have on my disk" case. But you can open the file in the same
> number of clicks but with a better interface, by launching a nautilus
> window. You can get it even faster if it's still in the "recently used"
I would say lots of people are used to think in the following way:
I want to open file `foo'.
Start program that handles file `foo'.
Open file `foo'
This works with files that you can edit (abiword files) and those you
can't (pdf). A distinction between the two is IMHO artificial.
Why not facilitate people that work like this and have one more entry
in the menu?
I would say there is even a better case for having evince in the menu
then for eog. eog opens files you can edit with programs like gimp,
while for evince there is no alternative `editor'.