[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal for Lenny: Please avoid duplicated changelogs for binary packages sharing the same source package



On Tue, 02 Jan 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 03:44:10PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> > I find it wasteful to install the same changelogs (both Debian and
> > upstream) in binary packages which share the same sources. Why not
> > have symlinks in place of these and perhaps an extra
> > /usr/share/doc directory named the same as the source package in
> > case a binary package of the same name doesn't exist.
> 
> the problem is, you can only do that if you have one of the binary
> package that is always installed with any of the other, else you will
> have dangling symlinks, and it's prohibited by the policy (no to mention
> that it would be quite useless !)

Additionally, there's no requirement that you have all of the binary
packages being the same version, or that a particular binary package
on one architecture is built with the same source on a different
architecture.

If the small waste of space that having changelogs in packages is a
problem, you probably don't want any of the contents of the
/usr/share/doc anyway. [I suppose this may be an argument for allowing
diversions of directories to /dev/null in dpkg, but I personally don't
have time to code that nor a desire to disappear.]


Don Armstrong

-- 
S: Make me a sandwich
B: What? Make it yourself.
S: sudo make me a sandwich
B: Okay.
 -- xkcd http://xkcd.com/c149.html

http://www.donarmstrong.com              http://rzlab.ucr.edu



Reply to: