On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 03:21:46PM +0100, Georg Neis wrote:
> > Also, but maybe you already did that, sorry in that case, please
> > consider joining the pkg-ocaml-maint project on alioth which is used to
> > collaboratively maintain (and hence keep consistence) all OCaml-related
> > packages in Debian.
> Good idea!
I just approved your addition to the project, please take some time to
study the Debian OCaml Packaging Policy [1] before starting working on
the package.
> > Get rid of "ocamlwc" at the beginning of the long description, it's
> > pointless to repeat package name there.
> Hmm, this seems strange to me. What do you suggest?
> I bet nearly every long description starts with the name of the
> corresponding software.
Your bet is wrong :) Generally speaking, follow the guidelines for
packages description available at [2].
Cheers.
[1] http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/ocaml_packaging_policy.html/
[2] http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-desc-basics
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature