Re: Tempfile best practice vs. man pages

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Tempfile best practice vs. man pages
From: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 00:33:34 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20061204233334.GW12864@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87psb0tu9k.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
References: <[🔎] 20061203231640.GA5422@doctormoo.dyndns.org> <[🔎] 87psb0tu9k.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>

On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 03:49:27PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The warning on mkstemp is wrong, or at least questionable.  

The info manual doesn't have this warning AFAICT.


Michael

Reply to:

References:
- Tempfile best practice vs. man pages
  - From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@fastmail.fm>
- Re: Tempfile best practice vs. man pages
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Mass closing of bugs ?
Next by Date: Re: BTS: Why no "invalid" or "notabug" tag?
Previous by thread: Re: Tempfile best practice vs. man pages
Next by thread: Correct fate for emacs20 bugs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread