Re: BTS: Why no "invalid" or "notabug" tag?
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:05:21 +0100, md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
>On Nov 30, Magnus Holmgren <holmgren@lysator.liu.se> wrote:
>
>> But what about the middle case, i.e. "the behaviour described could be
>> reproduced, but it's not a bug, or at least not our fault"? (Bugzilla calls
>> this "INVALID").
>I agree that it could be useful, since I get a lot of these cases...
Why does that matter? You close everything that is not clearly a bug
anyway, immediately.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Reply to: