Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy

[Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr>]

On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 12:01:10AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>         Firstly, should we be pointing to the SuS instead of POSIX
>  (there is work going on a new version of the SUS), since it is open,
>  and readily available on th 'net, and people can readily see it (as
>  opposed to people who have shelled out $500 for a version)?

Very much agreed. I don't think Debian policy should mention non-free
documents, and certainly not documents unavailable to developers.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>

Imagine a large blue swirl here.