Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > It has recently come to my attention that nfs-utils (which is priority > standard) cannot depend on ucf, since ucf is of priority optional. > > I can only see four solutions for this: > > a) Ignore the problem for etch, figure out what do to afterwards. > b) Downgrade nfs-utils' priority (but I don't think this is a very good > idea). > c) Rip out the ucf dependency (possible, but far from ideal; using ucf > instead of regular conffile handling allowed me to close a few bugs, > at least one of them RC). > d) Upgrade ucf to priority standard. > > I'd personally go with d); would anybody have objections to this? (Cc-ing > Manoj as the ucf maintainer, even though I'd believe he reads -devel.) I would suggest b); reducing the "standard" set of packages seems like a feature, it won't break upgrades (if installed, the package will stay installed), and new installs don't need to get nfs-kernel-server as part of the *default* install. If someone wants to run an nfs server, they can install an nfs server package, either nfs-kernel-server or nfs-user-server (no good reason to prefer one to the other). - Josh Triplett
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature