Re: Compiling packages for the standard distribution with -Os instead of -O2
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:02:57AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> For Etch and Sid, it is probably a good idea to use -Os instead of -O2 at
> least on the bigger arches (ia32, ia64, amd64, etc), as we can probably
> trust gcc not to screw up.
If gcc generally generates faster code with -Os than -O2, then isn't
that a gcc bug, in that the optimizations enabled by -O2 are incorrectly
picked?
[Also, are there that man AMD64 machines with limited memory? Or IA64?]
Reply to: