Re: Bug#354831: ITP: bfc -- Brainfuck compiler
Scripsit Panu Kalliokoski <atehwa@sange.fi>
> I only saw the last one of the flame wars you mention, and it didn't
> even cross my mind that this ITP would gather similar attention.
For the record, I don't care any which way about the name [1]; my
reaction would have been the same if it was called "brownfox". I was
reacting to the (to me) evident uselessness of the proposed package.
[1] Except that I think it grossly overstates the strangeness of what
is just a straightforward if rather verbose encoding of a well-known
computation model, but that is not the packager's fault.
--
Henning Makholm "Apologies if I am repeating obvious
conclusions. My only gateway onto the Net is
very expensive, and I miss many important postings...
Please write to me and tell me what you think. I don't get much mail."
Reply to: