Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)
- From: Cord Beermann <cord@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 07:33:04 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20060302133304.GA19794@murphy.debian.org>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20060228234741.GA4089@javifsp.no-ip.org>
- References: <7f45d9390602211207u19decb18p16df73b73fe2df55@mail.gmail.com> <20060221203327.GE24457@debian.potter> <20060222072045.GB17619@ngolde.de> <20060222082432.GA5138@debian.potter> <20060222091754.GA32029@ngolde.de> <20060224094017.GB5567@murphy.debian.org> <20060224130331.GA31142@murphy.debian.org> <20060228234741.GA4089@javifsp.no-ip.org>
Hallo! Du (Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a) hast geschrieben:
>I've just bounced all the spam from Debian mailing lists that got through my
>(local and ISP's) filters and I had stored in a separate folder to that
>address. They are 33, hopefully it will not get me blacklisted.
>
>Is it OK if we, mutt users, use this?
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[snip]
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
it's ok if you script it and make it easy to report.
it's not ok to bounce us spam from years ago, this address is another
feedback-loop to enhace our filters, it's useless to get old[1] spam
there.
(and for those that expect immediate healing from this: the input
won't be piped into some filters for learning, as it would be to
easy to poison it then.)
[1] older than two days.
Cord
--
http://lists.debian.org
Reply to: