Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?
- To: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net>
- Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:36:11 -0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87mzgsowro.fsf@becket.becket.net>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] slqk8j5e.fsf@blue.sea.net> (Jari Aalto's message of "Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:24:45 +0200")
- References: <20060119233855.GC12818@localdomain> <20060120001551.GZ18803@alcor.net> <87psmnik6m.fsf@becket.becket.net> <20060120050930.GG18803@alcor.net> <87k6cvh0a7.fsf@becket.becket.net> <20060120172252.GP18803@alcor.net> <87d5ilvrms.fsf@becket.becket.net> <1138288663.12468.29.camel@silicium.ccc.cea.fr> <20060127010401.GA6849@localdomain> <1138351367.16359.22.camel@silicium.ccc.cea.fr> <20060127114636.GA10536@country.grep.be> <1138410838.8246.8.camel@arrakis.localnet> <877j8jhgak.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <1138505518.5097.28.camel@arrakis.localnet> <[🔎] slqk8j5e.fsf@blue.sea.net>
Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net> writes:
> This is not to day that Python is bad - It has better OO, which Perl
> unfortunately negletted fromt he very starts. Now, talk about Perl OO
> and that's hairy!.
Actually, Python *also* ignored OO at the beginning.
It has grafted it on, but since real OO is either Smalltalk or the
Metaobject Protocol, I'll have to beg off on whether C++ or Perl or
Python has "better" OO.
Reply to: