Re: Honesty in Debian (was Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:09:26AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> You said "we *ALL* voted to keep it", which means that every vote cast
> was to keep non-free. In other words, the vote was unanimous.
Oh, whatever, i take back the word 'all' then in that sentence, i guess that
almost everyone understood what i was trying to say though.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Honesty in Debian (was Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
- Re: Honesty in Debian (was Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Re: Honesty in Debian (was Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: Honesty in Debian (was Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>
- Re: Honesty in Debian (was Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: Honesty in Debian (was Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>
- Re: Honesty in Debian (was Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: Honesty in Debian (was Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>