On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 06:20:40PM +0200, Sami Haahtinen wrote: > Andrew Suffield wrote: > > If you can't understand sarcasm, why didn't you read the part for > > people who can't understand sarcasm? > > I read the part about sarcasm and i partially argee with you. But i'm > with Andreas here. Your post didn't help anyone, the original Ubuntu > post was important to quite a few people. Windows security advisories are surely important to quite a few people, and probably to more readers of -devel-announce than Ubuntu stuff. Are you saying that it would be okay to post these? If not, then you need to rethink your reasoning here. Personally, I don't think "important to the subscribers" is the correct measure. > I can understand that a part of the people behind Debian feel hostile > against Ubuntu because it's succeeding in something that Debian was > trying to achieve. But what i can't understand is that people behind > Ubuntu are trying to reach out and build a bridge between the people in > Debian and some people are intentionally trying to burn them. They are > really investing time on the co-operation, they are creating tools to > help this. What are the Debian people doing, they are bitching about > Ubuntu people not putting their backs in to it. I considered editing this out, but I'm quoting it instead because it's a neat bit of libel[0] in an attempt to change the subject. This is not about Ubuntu at all - it could have been *anybody*'s press release being reposted. This is about appropriate use of Debian mailing lists. [0] I don't know who made this shit up, but as far as I'm aware it's purely fictional. We're objecting to Ubuntu's *PR*, and they're complaining that we're trying to stop collaberation? WTF? -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature