On Sun, 2006-12-24 at 02:22 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 00:38 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > To conclude, the support of multiple python versions is not meant at > > > all as an excuse for lazy debian maintainers depending on python for > > > not following upstream python development. > > > > Are you calling me lazy for not fixing a bug that you never bothered to > > report before you uploaded an illegal NMU? > > WTF is an illegal NMU? Matthias uploaded an NMU where there was no bug report filed. (The filing of a patch is not a substitute for a regular bug report for the bug you think the patch fixes.) Moreover, the bug is a *wishlist* bug and there is no cause for uploading NMUs for wishlist bugs, let alone anything but a release-critical bug. Moreover, Matthias made absolutely no attempt to contact me; he simply went ahead and uploaded. In no way did he follow the procedures to be followed before making NMUs. Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part