Re: BTS: Why no "invalid" or "notabug" tag?
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 12:56:27 -0800, Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>
wrote:
>On Fri, 08 Dec 2006, Marc Haber wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 16:51:26 -0800, Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>
>> wrote:
>> >$ GET http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control|grep block
>> ><dt><code>block</code> <var>bugnumber</var> <code>by</code> <var>bug</var> ...
>> > <dd>Note that the fix for the first bug is blocked by the other listed bugs.
>> ><dt><code>unblock</code> <var>bugnumber</var> <code>by</code> <var>bug</var> ...
>> > <dd>Note that the fix for the first bug is no longer blocked by the other
>>
>> That's hardly what I'd call "documented".
>
>What more do you want? That's really all that blocking and unblocking
>does.
What happens to a bug when it's blocked? Which operations do behave as
if the bug were not blocked, which operations behave differently, and
what's the behavioral difference between being blocked and not?
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Reply to: