Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 09:48:31PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * David Weinehall:
> > On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 07:13:22PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> >> Michelle Konzack <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> > ...and where is SuSv3 in Debian (which package?).
> >> [...]
> >> Nonfree. http://packages.debian.org/susv3
> > Uhm, no?
> > susv3:
> > Installed: 6.1
> > Candidate: 6.1
> > Version table:
> > 6.1 0
> > 500 http://ftp.se.debian.org unstable/contrib Packages
> It's just an installer. The actual document is not even
> redistributable (which makes it kind of weired that Debian relies so
> heavily on it).
I was just correcting the location of the package, not making a
political statement one way or the other.
We do rely quite heavily on the glibc too, yet its documentation is
/) David Weinehall <email@example.com> /) Rime on my window (\
// ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ // Diamond-white roses of fire //
\) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Beautiful hoar-frost (/