Re: Question about "Depends: bash"

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Question about "Depends: bash"
From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:06:23 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20061121100623.GA26846@bongo.bofh.it>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20061120165852.GO9689@freenet.de>
References: <[🔎] 0zNfXD.A.fZB.swJYFB@tp570.private> <[🔎] 0kj634-m96.ln1@argenau.downhill.at.eu.org> <[🔎] 20061120165852.GO9689@freenet.de>

On Nov 20, Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@freenet.de> wrote:

> Debian Users!  -  I have read it even on THIS list,
> that some peoples remove it since it is to huge.
People are stupid. Next.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about "Depends: bash"
  - From: Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@freenet.de>

References:
- Question about "Depends: bash"
  - From: Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@freenet.de>
- Re: Question about "Depends: bash"
  - From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>
- Re: Question about "Depends: bash"
  - From: Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@freenet.de>

Prev by Date: Do we need an upgrade package?
Next by Date: Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two
Previous by thread: Re: Question about "Depends: bash"
Next by thread: Re: Question about "Depends: bash"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread