[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy

On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 18:15 -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> A builtin ls might be a good idea for disaster recovery shells,
> though zsh-static does not have it.  posh is not intended to be
> such a shell, nor to be particularly useful interactively.
> Since I cannot think of a legitimate reason for anyone to use
> ls in a shell script, I think it would add little value.

Well, the goal was (in part) to catch scripts which use non-Posix
features of echo and test; why are non-Posix features of ls not an


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: