On Nov 17, Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de> wrote: > Brainfuck is a known programming language but that > should not make any difference here from the debian > perspective. So "fuck" also occurs in other names and/or > package descriptions (here its not even "fuck") as a part of a name > but its not in any description or stands as > a single word. So maybe the problem is not "fuck" but 1337-speech. > I don't really care if w3bfukk0r makes it into the archive > or not but I propose to make a statement about package names > in the policy if they can be a reason for a reject. > Opinions? Too hard for too little gain. It's the ftpmasters call anyway. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature