[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy

On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 19:17 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>         In this case, your scripts are meant tot be runnable using a
>  POSIX (+ a few features) compatible shell on a Debian system.   It is
>  understood that the shells in question do not have grave bugs.

I know what Posix.2 says, but it does not define the term "POSIX
compatible shell".  Can you tell me what that means?  I really am
genuinely stymied.  I think some people have an incorrect understanding
of what POSIX actually says in this regard, but I'm not sure.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: