[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy

On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 20:51 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > I can live with a list of features.  But then, geez, don't you think the
> > actual list should be given?  Saying "works on a Posix compatible shell"
> > restricts way too much (you can't use "debconf" then) unless we wink and
> Could you just stop spreading this debconf example, it's utterly wrong.

Are you saying that Posix.2 limits what things a shell can make a
builtin?  Can you provide a reference?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: