On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 20:51 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > I can live with a list of features. But then, geez, don't you think the > > actual list should be given? Saying "works on a Posix compatible shell" > > restricts way too much (you can't use "debconf" then) unless we wink and > > Could you just stop spreading this debconf example, it's utterly wrong. Are you saying that Posix.2 limits what things a shell can make a builtin? Can you provide a reference? Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part