Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 12:01:10AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Firstly, should we be pointing to the SuS instead of POSIX
> (there is work going on a new version of the SUS), since it is open,
> and readily available on th 'net, and people can readily see it (as
> opposed to people who have shelled out $500 for a version)?
Very much agreed. I don't think Debian policy should mention non-free
documents, and certainly not documents unavailable to developers.
Imagine a large blue swirl here.