[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Lots of (easily recognisible) spam sent to the BTS today



In article <E1GeU9Z-0004Jl-54@scyw00225.scy001.de> mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de writes:
>On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:02:41 -0800, Blars Blarson <blarson@blars.org>
>wrote:
>>We have a SA rule for this run now, but sending such hints to
>>owner@bugs will get them seen much faster than debian-devel that I'm
>>more than a week behind in reading.
>
>So you really want to be manually informed about spam runs against the
>BTS? Don't you notice unusual activity in some rrd-based monitoring
>system?

If you have an idea for a new spamassassin rule that will get a
current spam run without triggering on non-spam, send it to
owner@bugs.  Unfortunatly, much spam is now using anti-bayes tecniques
and is hard to catch without also getting non-spam.

I do see each message with a SA score >= -1, but at times I've been
days behind slogging through them.


-- 
Blars Blarson			blarson@blars.org
				http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option.  It is a standard feature.



Reply to: