Re: Lots of (easily recognisible) spam sent to the BTS today
In article <[🔎] E1GeU9Z-0004Jlemail@example.com> firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
>On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:02:41 -0800, Blars Blarson <email@example.com>
>>We have a SA rule for this run now, but sending such hints to
>>owner@bugs will get them seen much faster than debian-devel that I'm
>>more than a week behind in reading.
>So you really want to be manually informed about spam runs against the
>BTS? Don't you notice unusual activity in some rrd-based monitoring
If you have an idea for a new spamassassin rule that will get a
current spam run without triggering on non-spam, send it to
owner@bugs. Unfortunatly, much spam is now using anti-bayes tecniques
and is hard to catch without also getting non-spam.
I do see each message with a SA score >= -1, but at times I've been
days behind slogging through them.
Blars Blarson firstname.lastname@example.org
With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.