[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug mass filling

On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 09:56:37PM +0200, Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> wrote:
> * Aurelien Jarno (aurelien@aurel32.net) [061019 21:31]:
> > Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > >A violation of the parts of the debian policy as listed on
> > >http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt is serious level (that
> > >should be the same as the must-directives in policy, but - well, I hope
> > >that I have finally time post-etch to sync that finally).
> > >
> > >Any other policy violation is at most important level (unless it
> > >conincides with one of the other criteria for RC bugs, of course).
> > >
> > 
> > Note that what we are discussing (must have in targets debian/rules) are 
> > listed on http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt
> As vorlon said, that is listed under the heading of "4. Autobuilding",
> so the scope is "buildds must not fail" of this rule. That is why I

Where does it say the scope for 4. Autobuilding is "buildds must not
fail" ?

It does say "Packages must autobuild without failure on all
architectures on which they are supported", but that's one of the
options that make a bug RC.

Reply to: