[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Missing days?

On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 02:34:11PM +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Hi!
> I have started to wonder a bit about 'missing days' - a thing that is
> especially importaint now when we are heading for a total freeze.
> >From http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/udev.html:
> Too young, only 1 of 10 days old
> [2006-10-15] Accepted 0.100-2.1 in unstable (low) 

I got:
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:02:15 -0700

Which is before the dinstall run on the 15th.  A few hours later
dinstall runs.  Yet a few hour later britney runs and sees it for
the first time.  At that point, it's 0 days old.

Than 24 hours later, britney runs again, and it's 1 day old.

In about 10 hours, britney will run again, and it will become 2 days

> But here:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kwin-style-crystal.html
> Too young, only 1 of 10 days old
> [2006-10-13] Accepted 1.0.2-1 in unstable (low)

Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:48:15 -0700

Which is a few hours after the dinstall run on the 13th.  A few hours
later when britney runs, it doesn't see it yet.  Britney only sees it
more than 24h after it was uploaded.  So it's 2 days old now.


Reply to: