Re: How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/15/06 14:28, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 01:10:33PM -0400, Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> wrote:
>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> Why *shouldn't* KDE, GNOME, Firefox/Iceweasel, Tbird, and anything
>>> that requires Mesa/OpenGL, and all of Charles Plessy's scientific
>>> packages be marked do_not_build on 68k/Coldfire & ARM?
>> Well, just for example, I know of people who run firefox on arm.
>
> Considering how we (firefox maintainers) got fixes for firefox on arm,
> mips, m68k and hppa, i can confirm that it is indeed used on
> architectures noone would have imagined it to be used ;)
I guess that's the answer, then... ;)
What about Wookey's not_RC idea?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFMsVZS9HxQb37XmcRAgKpAKCbR79qVHbHNDqKfpILC30kCoYiggCgg9RL
/f7BkKuKfIadELBtR2P3XIc=
=yQZt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: