Re: Orphan party

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Orphan party
From: Miguel Gea Milvaques <xerakko@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:19:13 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 4531FD11.7050907@ellobo>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1160873812.2832.26.camel@tomoyo>
References: <[🔎] 1160873812.2832.26.camel@tomoyo>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Come on!

I'm helping to this Orphan party!

The people are going to win in Debian can maintain this one too:

* libmatheval. As h5utils as been orphaned, and libmatheval has it as
reverse depends, It will be a good idea that the same person maintain
this one too.



- ----
WE ARE *NOT* UBUNTU!!!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFMf0RNTNQylgICMQRAhNEAKCKanZJaKJBsMnKGNatbnF421+TiwCeIRZs
tTa8x4wksvu17uCpbwPR60Y=
=45x+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to:

References:
- Orphan party
  - From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?
Next by Date: Re: How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?
Previous by thread: Re: Orphan party
Next by thread: Re: Orphan party, relax...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread