Re: How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: Wookey <wookey@aleph1.co.uk>
Subject: Re: How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?
From: Toni Mueller <toni@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 12:21:35 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20061014102135.11511.qmail@oak.oeko.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20061014100619.GC20396@2004.bluespice.org>
References: <[🔎] 20061014013014.GB30151@xios> <[🔎] 20061014100619.GC20396@2004.bluespice.org>

Hello,

I agree with most of what Wookey and you said, but would like some
clarification on this:

On Sat, 14.10.2006 at 12:06:20 +0200, Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2006.bluespice.org> wrote:
> But sadly, I have very little hope that Debian will change anything it's
> release structure soon. *sigh* 


Best,
--Toni++

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?
  - From: Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2006.bluespice.org>

References:
- How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?
  - From: Wookey <wookey@aleph1.co.uk>
- Re: How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?
  - From: Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2006.bluespice.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#392906: ITP: ophcrack -- Microsoft Windows password cracker using rainbow tables
Next by Date: Re: How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?
Previous by thread: Re: How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?
Next by thread: Re: How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread