Hello! Taking this out of bug [1] and to d-d to have a more advice on the correct action to be taken (as per DevRef §5.9.2 [2]). On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:47:08 +0200, Michael Holzt wrote: >> Good idea, I talked with Eugeniy about that. Though, I guess the >> final decision is to the obexserver maintainer. > > Totally fine with me. Go ahead and remove obexserver from the > distribution. > >> Since my NMU on affix, when it propagates to testing, obexserver >> will be the last user of the old libopenobex-1.0-0 package: > > This is nice as well. As the maintainer agrees, we should ask for remotion of obexserver (and successively libopenobex-1.0-0, cc:ing its maintainer). While the latter has no opened bugs, the former has 4 bugs: how should we deal with them? Just close them with remotion of the package? Another question: is it worth to remove the package from etch, too? Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca Footnotes: [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=363689 [2] http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-removing-pkgs
Attachment:
pgpXHnY36Shtl.pgp
Description: PGP signature