On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 10.09.2006, 21:22 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > For my part, I find it pretty offensive that a mailing list that's set as > > the maintainer of a package would have mail filters configured this way in > > the first place. For the samba packaging team, for instance, I've taken > > pains to adjust the spam filters to allow bts mail in automatically before > > ever setting the maintainer field to point to the list; I would expect other > > packaging teams to take the same care. > Can you publish/describe your setup? Sorry, I should have been clearer: to date, we have not yet pointed the maintainer field at this list, out of concern over bouncing legitimate bug mail. I've just made this change in the svn repo though, so we'll have a chance to test these rules out following the next upload and I'll be happy to publish the details as soon as I know we have something that works as intended. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature