Re: glibc and UNACCEPTs
Anthony Towns wrote:
> Yesterday, glibc 2.3.999.2-10 was accidently uploaded to unstable
instead of experimental [...] Would anyone like to contribute their
thoughts, so we can do an "air crash" style failure analysis to work out
how we can avoid this class of problem in future, given the safety net
that caught us this time is going away?
Is there any sensible reason for ever uploading a package in unstable
with a higher version than in experimental? If not, such uploads can
simply be forbidden altogether.