[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Policy regarding virtual packages



Roger Leigh wrote:
Hi folks,

Following some discussion with Marco d'Itri about inetd, I'd like to
put forward some more general thoughts on virtual package handling for
some comments.

Currently, virtual packages (such as mail-transport-agent) cannot be
specified by themselves.  They can only be used in combination with a
non-virtual package which provides the default implementation.  For
example:


I just hope this is not true, because there are thousands packages in the archive depending on libc6-dev, or libc6-dev | libc-dev. Both libc6-dev and libc-dev are virtual packages on some architectures (such as alpha or ia64).

--
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno	            | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net



Reply to: