Re: glibc and UNACCEPTs
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:42:46PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> The Dear Project Leader wrote:
> > Yesterday, glibc 2.3.999.2-10 was accidently uploaded to unstable instead
> > of experimental, and on the request of the release managers, I UNACCEPTed
> > it, given it was a major accidental change to a rather core library just
> > as that library should've been frozen.
> > The 2.3.999.2-10 upload (with signatures removed) is available on
> > ftp-master.debian.org/~ajt/glibc/. Would anyone like to contribute their
> > thoughts, so we can do an "air crash" style failure analysis to work
> > out how we can avoid this class of problem in future, given the safety
> > net that caught us this time is going away?
> Unfortunately it's happened against, this time with the upload of
> xorg-server (xserver-xorg-core) 1:1.1.1-3, accidentally uploaded to
> unstable instead of experimental. An easy enough mistake, it's only
> one little field in a changelog file.
Crap. Sorry everyone.
- David Nusinow