[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: glibc and UNACCEPTs

Simon Richter wrote:
> I'm not sure it scales that well if you apply it to the entire archive,
> due to the overhead of the mirror pulse. It might make sense to have
> "mini-pulses" for parts of the archive, such as d-i.

That doesn't work very well unless it can be very targeted; the parts of
the archive that most often need to be updated to avoid blocking d-i
development for a day or two are packages in base (like glibc..) and not
d-i itself.

see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: