[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: glibc and UNACCEPTs

On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 01:15 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 04:59:13PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> > Well, if you hadn't been awake, the maintainers would have had to upload
> > a package with an ugly version number (or even an epoch), which would
> > not be the end of the world.
> Not everyone agrees with that :) 

Could you specify why a reupload with a higher version number would be
the end of the world, or at least, a more serious problem than the one
it would try to solve? Another upload is a way to fix bugs in your
package which works very well, and I don't see why it wouldn't work in
this case?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: