Re: RFC: ssl-cert2 design
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 10:03:13AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti:
> > * Make it easier for package maintainers
> > - One extra dh_ call and maybe one more file in debian/
> How badly is this tied to debhelper? Any chance of designing it so that
> it doesn't require debhelper?
The dh_ file can be shipped with ssl-cert2, preferably under a name
that doesn't invade debhelper's namespace. As the packages are going
to depend on ssl-cert2, making them build-depend on it is not a real
1KB // Q: How do you spot a good inetd?
// A: It build-depends on equivs.