Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:09:56 -0400, Joe Smith
> Well, strictly speaking all circular dependencies could be
> considered a policy violation because they depend on dpkg not
> working as policy states it does.
Could you elaborate on this?
Do infants enjoy infancy as much as adults enjoy adultery? George
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C