Re: #195752: Can somebody mark this bug as grave or critical?
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <email@example.com> wrote in message
[🔎] 20060701094153.GA15646@uio.no">news:[🔎] 20060701094153.GA15646@uio.no...
severity 195752 important
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 08:43:57PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
But yeah, I'm not in an official position to say, but if this
isn't considered a "critical" or at least "grave" bug, then
I don't know what is.
Agreed. I tried to ping the release team on IRC before, but they
were all busy it seemed. So since changing severity isn't a final,
irreversible action, I am just doing it.
I really can't get this to be critical in any way; it does not make the
entire system break (unless you count temporary loss of network access on
laptop critical), it does not cause serious data loss (or really data loss
all), and it does not introduce a security hole. I can't fit it into any
the other categories on http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt
thus, I'm downgrading it to important. Sure, I agree it is a bad bug which
should be fixed, but critical? Not IMHO.
(In case of further disagreement, I'd leave it to the maintainer, who has
final say pending the RMs' input, to decide the severity.)
Actually I agree that critical is too high, grave might be reasonable, as it
causes system downtime. (System downtime is something anybody running
servers would agree is a very big problem).
However I suspect it is at least Serious.
Definition of serious:
"serious is a severe violation of Debian policy (roughly, it violates a
"must" or "required" directive), or, in the package maintainer's opinion,
makes the package unsuitable for release."
The maintainer apparently agrees this is a very nasty problem, and may very
well feel that it makes the package unsuitable for release.
Of course only the package maintainer could set the package to serious for
that particular reason.