Re: RFC: transitioning towards using BTS versioning for NMUs (and experimental)
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 05:15:02PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Since our default development suite is unstable, IMHO, does make sense
> to see bugs in previous versions that are solved in unstable.
Well, what do you propose as criteria for showing that? What do you mean by
"previous versions" -- everything back to 1.0-1?
> We can have a link for the other suites showing the bugs of them there
> as an option. Makes simple and clear for us, IMHO.
This is already there, right at the bottom. It could be made more accessible,
> Ahh, of course. This will be awesome to have working! It'll mean that
> uploads for unstable don't need to reinclude all closes that were
> close in experimental anymore. Perfect.
Yes, that's one of the advantages. :-)
> Thank you very much for your and Don's work on BTS :-)
I'm afraid my contribution to the BTS code is near-zero; you probably mean
Andreas Barth. I'm prepared to put code behind my suggestions if nobody else
wants to, though.
/* Steinar */